{"id":355,"date":"2022-03-10T20:11:37","date_gmt":"2022-03-10T19:11:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/?p=355"},"modified":"2022-03-20T19:42:49","modified_gmt":"2022-03-20T18:42:49","slug":"art-of-bibliography-brazil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/2022\/03\/10\/art-of-bibliography-brazil\/","title":{"rendered":"Art of Bibliography: Brazil"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>2021 edition of the International Seminar The Art of Bibliography was held online in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Seminar was promoted by the Federal University of S\u00e3o Carlos (UFSCar \/ Brazil), with the participation of Dr. Luciana de Souza Gracioso and Dr. Zaira Regina Zafalon, in partnership with the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ \/ Brazil), with Dr. Andr\u00e9 Vieira de Freitas Ara\u00fajo, the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Unirio \/ Brazil) and the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (IBICT \/ Brazil), with Dr. Gustavo Saldanha, and Universit\u00e0 di Bologna (Unibo \/ Italy), in the person of Dr. Giulia Crippa. The previous editions took place in Rio de Janeiro, S\u00e3o Paulo, Belo Horizonte, Vit\u00f3ria, Recife, and Florian\u00f3polis, in person, in Brazilian universities, and the last one, remotely, was based in Ravenna (Italy).<\/p>\n<p>The live stream sessions are available on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/ufscaroficial\">YouTube<\/a> so the event can be followed by a wider audience. With more than 250 participants, mainly from Brazil, it had participants from Argentina, the United States, Peru, Portugal, and Uruguay.<\/p>\n<p>Keeping in mind historical and contemporary issues of Bibliography approached as art, science, technique, technology, and method. The problematizations proposed a conceptual and technical rethinking of Bibliography as a discipline that supports the process of knowledge construction, mainly in the academic and scientific, focusing on social justice issues, both in terms of bibliographic praxis and its exercise of social transformation.<\/p>\n<p>The Seminar began on December 9th with the Opening Conference entitled \u201cThe education of ethnic-racial relations in Science teaching: construction of a field?\u201d, given by Dr. Douglas Verrangia (UFSCar), which was followed by the Thematic Session Transgressions and Insurgencies in the Bibliography, with the participation of Dr. Ant\u00f3n Castro M\u00edguez (UFSCar), who presented \u201cA transgressive look at (making p)art of the bibliography: initial provocations)\u201d and Dr. Fabr\u00edcio Jos\u00e9 Nascimento da Silveira (UFMG), with \u201cRepresentational insurgencies: when subordinate individuals and groups claim the word\u201d. In the afternoon of this day, there were simultaneous sessions for the presentation of papers and discussion of proposals and the Thematic Session The Discourse and Bibliographic Practice and its Relationship with Social Justice, with the presentations: \u201cBibliography and documentary democracy: horizons of metalinguistic social justice\u201d by Dr. Gustavo Silva Saldanha (IBICT\/UNIRIO), \u201cDiscourse and bibliographic work in the Annals of the National Library: between documents and institutional commitment\u201d by Dr. Carlos Henrique Juv\u00eancio da Silva (UFF) and \u201cCritical cataloging: a reflection on the potential of cataloging for social justice\u201d by Dr. Lucia Sardo (UNIBO, Italy).<\/p>\n<p>On December 10th, Dr. Giulia Crippa (UNIBO, Italy) delivered the Conference \u201cTelling history and cultural memory: Public History and Bibliography\u201d followed by the Thematic Session Human Migrations and Epistemicides, in which Dr. Bruno Nathansohn (UFRJ) presented \u201cBetween the fluidity of human migrations and documental fixity: refugee narratives as bio-bibliographic sources\u201d Johnny Passos (UFSCar), from the Xakriab\u00e1 ethnic group, commented on the research \u201cMapping the Brazilian scientific production of theses and dissertations on indigenous issues\u201d and Mrs. Franci\u00e9le Carneiro Garc\u00eas da Silva, Master on Information Science (UFMG) discussed \u201c(Re)knowing Black Bibliography: from epistemicide to informational justice\u201d . During the afternoon, 8 papers were presented in simultaneous sessions and the Closing Conference Patrimonial and contextual texture of the document, in which Dr. Jos\u00e9 Augusto Chaves Guimar\u00e3es (UNESP) presented \u201cThe document as context: rethinking the materiality of a content\u201d and Dr. Andr\u00e9 de Freitas Araujo (UFRJ), \u201cCritical dimensions of bibliographic heritage: meanings, value systems, and cultural rights\u201d.<br \/>\nThe Proceedings can be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.telescopium.ufscar.br\/index.php\/viii\/viii\/schedConf\/presentations\">checked here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Zaira Regina Zafalon and Andre Vieira de Freitas Araujo<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>2021 edition of the International Seminar The Art of Bibliography was held online in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Seminar was promoted by the Federal University of S\u00e3o Carlos (UFSCar \/ Brazil), with the participation of Dr. Luciana de Souza Gracioso and Dr. Zaira Regina Zafalon, in partnership with the Federal University of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1045,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[101,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conferences","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1045"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":363,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions\/363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/bibliography\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}