{"id":351,"date":"2014-09-03T09:32:18","date_gmt":"2014-09-03T08:32:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/?p=351"},"modified":"2014-09-03T09:32:18","modified_gmt":"2014-09-03T08:32:18","slug":"another-summary-of-table-discussion-at-the-knowledge-cafe-2014-in-lyon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/2014\/09\/03\/another-summary-of-table-discussion-at-the-knowledge-cafe-2014-in-lyon\/","title":{"rendered":"Another summary of table discussion at the Knowledge Caf\u00e9 2014 in Lyon"},"content":{"rendered":"

Learning from others \u2013 peer training best practices<\/strong><\/p>\n

Moderator: Hannah Fischer, Library of Congress, USA
\nRapporteur: Karin Finer, European Parliament, Belgium<\/p>\n

There were many interesting discussions and examples of peer training activities around the world, including projects for sharing ideas and experiences on national level (http:\/\/osaavat.org\/peerlearning\/), dedicated websites for professional discussions on international\/national\/regional level, training days organised by library associations or equivalent, and individual library initiatives to ensure sharing of knowledge.<\/p>\n

The efficiency of different formats for peer training was debated. Online tutorials, e-mail communication, social media, presentations at staff meetings, one-to-one training etc. can all be used. The preferred format is of course very much dependent on an organisation’s staff resources and size.<\/p>\n

The question of whether peer training programmes should be formal or not was discussed. Some felt that it would be easier to motivate involvement in training if management actively supported and allowed time for such activities. One library had developed a peer training contract, to be signed by management, the trainer and the trainee. This contract notified management of the peer trainer\u2019s intentions, and resulted in the peer trainer gaining extra work time to plan and complete their peer training program. Other types of buddy\/mentor programmes to train new staff were described.<\/p>\n

An interesting\u00a0example of peer involvement was given by two libraries\u00a0who had introduced a system where staff\u00a0giving client training was observed and evaluated by colleagues. It worked well, due to the evaluation being firmly based on positive feedback in a friendly environment. It was seen as important to\u00a0support others to become confident trainers.<\/p>\n

Finally, the question of reluctance to share knowledge was brought to the table. Some\u00a0colleagues felt there was no culture of sharing information in their organisation, and in some cases even resistance against it. Participants thought it was important to encourage all staff in an organisation to\u00a0be part of\u00a0peer training. There are many ways to be involved \u2013 as a classroom trainer, helping to develop online tools and training materials, writing reports from courses and conferences, and\/or by acting as a reference point for questions in areas of individual competence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Learning from others \u2013 peer training best practices Moderator: Hannah Fischer, Library of Congress, USA Rapporteur: Karin Finer, European Parliament, Belgium There were many interesting discussions and examples of peer training activities around the world, including projects for sharing ideas and experiences on national level (http:\/\/osaavat.org\/peerlearning\/), dedicated websites for professional discussions on international\/national\/regional level, training […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":684,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,13465],"tags":[21097,162,9378],"class_list":["post-351","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-ifla-congress","tag-best-practice","tag-communication","tag-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/684"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":354,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351\/revisions\/354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ifla.org\/cpdwl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}